• IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA

Published in The Muskogee Phoenix February 23, March 2, 9 & 16 2017
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA. IN RE: THE MATTER OF: NIC3HOLE HESLEY, Petitioner, and RONALD HESLEY, Respondent. Case No. FC2014-006078. ORDER TO APPEAR T E M P O R A R Y ORDER HEARING RE: MODIFICATION OF PARENTING TIME. YOU, NICHOLE HESLEY AND RONALD HESLEY ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR IN PERSON AT THE REMPORARY ORDER HEARING SET BEFORE JUDGE PAMELA SVOBODA ON MARCH 21, 2017 @ 11:00 A.M. FOR 30 MINUTES.
THE HONORABLE PAMELA SVOBODA, MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CENTRAL, COURT BUILDING, 7TH FLOOR 201 W. JEFFERSON, COURTROOM 702, PHOENIX ARIZONA 85003. EVIDENCE WILL BE TAKEN. IT IS F U R T H E R ORDERED THAT NO LATER THAN 3 BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING, A TRUE COPY OF THIS “ORDER TO APPEAR” AND A TRUE COPY OF THE MOTION AND THE DOCUMENTS FILED WITH THE MOTION SALL BE SERVED BY THE MOVING PARTY ON THE PARTIES WHO ARE REQUIRED TO APPREAR. A TRUE COPY OF THESE DOCUMENTS SHALL ALSO BE MAILED
IMMEDIATELY TO PARTIES WHO HAVE APPEARED THIS ACTION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARIZONA RULES OF FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE, RULES 40, 41, 42, AND 43.
THE RESPONDING PARTY MAY FILE A RESPONSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 91, ARIZONA RULES OF FAMILY LAW PRODECURE. COPIES OF THE RESPONSE AND ALL RELATED DOCUMENTS MUST BE SERVED ON THE MOVING PARTY OR MOVING PARTY’S ATTORNEY IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 43, ARIZONA RULES OF FAMILY LAW PROCEDURE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDER ANY EVIDENCE INTENDED TO BE SUBMITTED AS EXHIBITS AT THE TIME OF THE TEMPORARY ORDERS HEARING MUST BE BROUGHT TO THIS COURT’S DIVISION AT MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CENTRAL COURT BUILDING, 201 W. JEFFERSON, SUITE 7B, PHOENIX, ARIZONA NO LATER THAN 12:00 PM ON 3/14/17 WITH A COVERSHEET LISTING THE NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF THE EXHIBITS. ALL EXHIBITS MUST BE HAND-DELIVERED TO THIS DIVISION AND MUST HAVE COLORED PAPER SEPARATING THE EXHIBITS. ANY EXHIBITS SUBMITTED SHALL BE COPIED TO THE OPPOSING PARTY AT THAT SAME TIME. THE PARTIES SHALL COORDINATE THEIR EXHIBITS SO THAT EACH PARTY DOES
NOT PRESENT D U P L I C A T E EXHIBITS OF THE OTHER PARTY. ANY AND ALL EXHIBITS RECEIVED BY THIS DIVISION LESS THAN THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING SHALL NOT BE PREMARKED FOR IDENT I F I C A T I O N. INSTEAD, ANY EXHIBITS RECEIVED LESS THAN THREE (3) BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING SHALL BE MARKED FOR INDENTIFICATION AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE HEARING AND THE TIME FOR MARKING SHALL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE R E S P E C T I V E PARTY’S ALLOTTED HEARING TIME.
FAILURE OF THE MOVING PARTY TO APPEAR AT THE TIME REQUIRED MAY RESULT IN AN ORDER DISMISSING THE PETITION. FAILURE OF THE R E S P O N D I N G PARTY TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN AN ORDER GRANTING ALL RELIEF REQUESTED IN THE PETITION.
DONE IN COURT THIS 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2017.
PAMELA SVOBODA HONORABLE
PAMELA SVOBODA JUDICIAL OFFICER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
This ad has been viewed 54 times
PostedMarch 16, 2017